[ROM] [4.1.2] Aviator Blur - v3.0.9 [11/15/13] Pick Your Own Color!
#861
Posted 25 March 2013 - 11:18 AM
#863
Posted 25 March 2013 - 06:26 PM
I flashed the latest update "cdma_spyder_9.8.2O-72_VZW-16_1ff" with RSD lite... and then Rooted my Phone with razr Blade...
Then i installed Bootstrap 3.11 and i boot into recovery, created a new Rom Slot and did Wiping(Factory Reset, Cahe, Dalvik Cache, System) twice. Then i installed the latest Aviator 3.0.0 , then did a wiping cahce twice. Then Clicked on the reboot. What is happening is its returning to recovery only... Please help.....I need this Rom to b flashed Soon... For that only i updated from .8 to .16
#864
Posted 26 March 2013 - 06:52 AM
#865
Posted 26 March 2013 - 10:15 AM
#866
Posted 26 March 2013 - 01:02 PM
Do the binaries in /system/app really need to differ / be resigned on a custom ROM? I find that I can replace them without apparent issue, so I am wondering why this is, if anyone has a good explanation.
Thanks.
#867
Posted 26 March 2013 - 01:10 PM
Do the binaries in /system/app really need to differ / be resigned on a custom ROM? I find that I can replace them without apparent issue, so I am wondering why this is, if anyone has a good explanation.
Thanks.
I had to resign the ROM when I added the pulldown toggles. I have just started rebuilding the ROM from a system pull but it will take a few days to get done
- cmh714 likes this
#868
Posted 26 March 2013 - 02:02 PM
Well, as a test, I replaced every APK that differed with the ones from the deodexed 98.72.16 stock ones, and it sure was broken. However, it did allow me to run Google+ long enough for it to be able to tell me that it depended upon "Google Play services" (GmsCore.apk), so I think my next test in the interim will be to replace Phonesky.apk and GmsCore.apk as a test to see what happens. Weird issue, but stellar ROM otherwise. I'm looking forward to the rebuilt ROM you mentioned, this is just as a stop-gap measure, and relatively safe since I have a full nandroid backup.
Thanks again for a great ROM and the hard work you've put into it.
#869
Posted 26 March 2013 - 04:22 PM
- MBRedline and cmh714 like this
#870
Posted 27 March 2013 - 06:33 AM
I managed to get Google+ to work last night, it was a signature issue. Google+ evidently (now) depends upon Google Play services (GsmCore.apk), and doesn't like the signature that's on GsmCore.apk in the Aviator ROM, so what I had to do was replace every system apk that uses the same shared user id (com.google.uid.shared, which on my phone is user id 10033; being that's it's Unix based, I assume numerical user id could change, but this is what worked for me). I found which packages listed in /data/system/packages.xml were using user id 10033 (NetworkLocation.apk, GoogleServicesFramework.apk GoogleContactsSyncAdapter.apk, GoogleLoginService.apk, and GsmCore.apk), replaced them with the ones from the deodexed stock 98.72.16 release, commented out the shared user com.google.uid.shared in /data/system/packages.xml), rebooted and cleared Cache and Dalvik, then installed Google+. Worked first time. I did have to set back up my Google accounts, but I've had no issues since, and Google+ works just fine now. The shared user com.google.uid.shared was recreated in /data/system/packages.xml during reboot, and may or may not have been necessary, but since I've seen issues come up due to shared user ids already existing, I did it just to be safe.
My gut instinct tells me that the only system APKs that need to be resigned are the ones that use the same shared user id in /data/system/packages.xml, but since I don't know which APK provides the drop-down toggles, I don't know which ones those might be.
I thought my findings might be helpful to you as rebuild the ROM from a system dump as you described earlier. Keep rocking out this great ROM!
#871
Posted 27 March 2013 - 07:10 AM
ZKK007,
I managed to get Google+ to work last night, it was a signature issue. Google+ evidently (now) depends upon Google Play services (GsmCore.apk), and doesn't like the signature that's on GsmCore.apk in the Aviator ROM, so what I had to do was replace every system apk that uses the same shared user id (com.google.uid.shared, which on my phone is user id 10033; being that's it's Unix based, I assume numerical user id could change, but this is what worked for me). I found which packages listed in /data/system/packages.xml were using user id 10033 (NetworkLocation.apk, GoogleServicesFramework.apk GoogleContactsSyncAdapter.apk, GoogleLoginService.apk, and GsmCore.apk), replaced them with the ones from the deodexed stock 98.72.16 release, commented out the shared user com.google.uid.shared in /data/system/packages.xml), rebooted and cleared Cache and Dalvik, then installed Google+. Worked first time. I did have to set back up my Google accounts, but I've had no issues since, and Google+ works just fine now. The shared user com.google.uid.shared was recreated in /data/system/packages.xml during reboot, and may or may not have been necessary, but since I've seen issues come up due to shared user ids already existing, I did it just to be safe.
My gut instinct tells me that the only system APKs that need to be resigned are the ones that use the same shared user id in /data/system/packages.xml, but since I don't know which APK provides the drop-down toggles, I don't know which ones those might be.
I thought my findings might be helpful to you as rebuild the ROM from a system dump as you described earlier. Keep rocking out this great ROM!
Thanks. Yeah, I knew it was the signatures as I had to resign a few and I probably over did it I'm working on getting away with resigning it so hopefully we won't have signature issues again
#872
Posted 27 March 2013 - 11:45 AM
#873
Posted 27 March 2013 - 11:50 AM
Hey guys, awesome ROM!!! Quick question, my battery life seems to be off a bit. I looked at GSAM battery monitor and I saw the Kernal was sucking a lot of juice. Is there some setting I should change?
Is your phone going into deep sleep? You can check with CPUSpy (Free). If not, wipe cache and dalvik cache and then check.
I'm not too far off finishing the next build and it looks like this will be a lot more error free. I built the whole thing from a system pull so it will be a fresh start. You might be able to test that and see if that helps if the above doesn't.
#874
Posted 28 March 2013 - 08:40 PM
yea my kernel usually always uses about 10 - 15% of battery for me. I am still getting outstanding stats though!Hey guys, awesome ROM!!! Quick question, my battery life seems to be off a bit. I looked at GSAM battery monitor and I saw the Kernel was sucking a lot of juice. Is there some setting I should change?
132.96KB 5 downloads
#875
Posted 29 March 2013 - 09:10 AM
#877
Posted 29 March 2013 - 09:25 AM
#878
Posted 29 March 2013 - 02:44 PM
#880
Posted 30 March 2013 - 08:39 AM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Aviator, ROM, OTA, ZKK007, Blur
10 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Bing (1)