552 replies to this topic

[mhotovec]

Well I guess that's both good and bad for you istick. Money is good, sometimes time off is better...

[Sinju33]

Update today, hopefully. My days off went bye-bye, but I got ridiculous overtime for it.

I was wondering what happened.

[Kyle06]

Update today, hopefully. My days off went bye-bye, but I got ridiculous overtime for it.

Very excited!
Will we have to do a fresh install with the update?

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

[Kyle06]

Any luck?

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

[feio]

Hi, and thanks for your work.
Will this release of the rom contain notification toggles embedded?

[mhotovec]

Hi, and thanks for your work.
Will this release of the rom contain notification toggles embedded?

It has Power Toggles baked in, you can set those up to be in the notification area. A superior way of doing it in my mind, because that way you get to choose the toggles you want.

[feio]

Toggles built inside static resources should use less memory and don't need to have an icon constantly into notification bar.
That's why I were asking about

[mhotovec]

Good point about the icon in the notification bar. Personally I put the battery status there with the 1% mod, so I hadn't noticed that I 'had' to have an icon there. You do have an option of making it transparent. It still takes up space, but at least you don't have to look at it.

As for how much memory it takes, I don't know that we have any way to know which of these uses less memory, but I get great battery live on this ROM. So if Power Toggles is using a bit more battery than built in widgets I'm OK with that, because it allows me to use the toggles *I* want, rather than toggles a Dev thinks I want. I prefer to have a flashlight toggle, which none of the Devs build in (I think it's a hard one to do, based on some of the conversations I've seen).

[feio]

In the end I agree with you
Starting from this consideration could be a great thing removing the native battery icon.
I really hate redundancy

[Sinju33]

Starting from this consideration could be a great thing removing the native battery icon.

Except the Power Toggle battery icons suck I just keep it transparent (except for this release due to small data icons)

[ezhy]

How about calender day instead of batt? It had made me a bit happier about this annoying icon

[Sinju33]

How about calender day instead of batt? It had made me a bit happier about this annoying icon

That would be redundant for me too (HD Widget clock/date/weather).

[jerkwad]

In the end I agree with you
Starting from this consideration could be a great thing removing the native battery icon.
I really hate redundancy

except i use the calendar icon and not the battery icon option in powertoggles ;-)

but i do hate redundancy too - maybe istick can release a patch .zip that will add/remove the battery icon so we can do both options.

[istick]

I'm actually working on customizable embedded toggles right now. Everything else is pretty much done, but this one thing is being a pain.

[Rootuser94]

I'm actually working on customizable embedded toggles right now. Everything else is pretty much done, but this one thing is being a pain.

O.o

[BytecodeMe]

I'm actually working on customizable embedded toggles right now. Everything else is pretty much done, but this one thing is being a pain.

I wish you the UTMOST of luck. Definitely a pain to get working without any source.

[churchmouth]

I'm actually working on customizable embedded toggles right now. Everything else is pretty much done, but this one thing is being a pain.

That would be really cool, I've never seen a Blur ROM with integrated customizable toggles like CM before.

[feio]

I can't set correctly frequence scaling range using No-Frills Cpu Control.
I'm trying to set 300Mhz-800Mhz but after a while it automatically returns to 300Mhz-1200Mhz.

Solutions?


EDIT Ok, reading previous posts I've found this issue is common. Anyone found a way to avoid this?

[churchmouth]

I can't set correctly frequence scaling range using No-Frills Cpu Control.
I'm trying to set 300Mhz-800Mhz but after a while it automatically returns to 300Mhz-1200Mhz.

Solutions?


EDIT Ok, reading previous posts I've found this issue is common. Anyone found a way to avoid this?

You could try running a script with SManager. Same way you'd do an OC script, except with your desired values

[deboyz1014]

I've posted the solution to this several pages back

SetCPU with profiles

Battery |= 0
Min 300 and Max 800
Priority 90

Screen off
Min 300 and Max 300
Priority 100.